Warum ich von "harris.anonymizer.com" nicht viel halte...
Weil eine gewisse Laura diesen seit einiger Zeit auch sehr gerne benutzt.
Kurze Kostprobe:
Zitat:
Oct 24 06:31:04 enya postfix/smtpd[27178]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[168.143.113.18]: 550 < unknown[168.143.113.18]>: Client host rejected: SPF-violating sender domain; from=< Dimo@indiatimes.com> to=< localpart@mydomain> proto=ESMTP helo=< harris.anonymizer.com>
Oct 24 06:33:18 enya postfix/smtpd[27178]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[168.143.113.18]: 550 < unknown[168.143.113.18]>: Client host rejected: SPF-violating sender domain; from=< Caleb@indiatimes.com> to=< localpart@mydomain> proto=ESMTP helo=< harris.anonymizer.com>
Oct 24 06:56:15 enya postfix/smtpd[27542]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[168.143.113.18]: 550 < unknown[168.143.113.18]>: Client host rejected: SPF-violating sender domain; from=< Claude@glay.org> to=< localpart@mydomain> proto=ESMTP helo=< harris.anonymizer.com>
Oct 24 06:56:56 enya postfix/smtpd[27542]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[168.143.113.18]: 550 < unknown[168.143.113.18]>: Client host rejected: SPF-violating sender domain; from=< Dew@fastermail.com> to=< localpart@mydomain> proto=ESMTP helo=< harris.anonymizer.com>
Oct 24 06:57:16 enya postfix/smtpd[27533]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[168.143.113.18]: 550 < unknown[168.143.113.18]>: Client host rejected: SPF-violating sender domain; from=< Colton@fastermail.com> to=< localpart@mydomain> proto=ESMTP helo=< harris.anonymizer.com>
Oct 24 07:02:08 enya postfix/smtpd[27542]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[168.143.113.18]: 550 < unknown[168.143.113.18]>: Client host rejected: SPF-violating sender domain; from=< Bryan@amuro.net> to=< localpart@mydomain> proto=ESMTP helo=< harris.anonymizer.com>
Oct 24 07:13:58 enya postfix/smtpd[27570]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[168.143.113.18]: 550 < unknown[168.143.113.18]>: Client host rejected: SPF-violating sender domain; from=< Constantinos@fastermail.com> to=< localpart@mydomain> proto=ESMTP helo=< harris.anonymizer.com>
Oct 24 07:20:00 enya postfix/smtpd[27618]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[168.143.113.18]: 550 < unknown[168.143.113.18]>: Client host rejected: SPF-violating sender domain; from=< Dionys@amuro.net> to=< localpart@mydomain> proto=ESMTP helo=< harris.anonymizer.com>
Oct 24 07:23:05 enya postfix/smtpd[27602]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[168.143.113.18]: 550 < unknown[168.143.113.18]>: Client host rejected: SPF-violating sender domain; from=< Chester@outgun.com> to=< localpart@mydomain> proto=ESMTP helo=< harris.anonymizer.com>
Oct 24 07:28:49 enya postfix/smtpd[27638]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[168.143.113.18]: 550 < unknown[168.143.113.18]>: Client host rejected: SPF-violating sender domain; from=< Diego@amuro.net> to=< localpart@mydomain> proto=ESMTP helo=< harris.anonymizer.com>
$ host harris.anonymizer.com
harris.anonymizer.com has address 168.143.113.18
Die Outblaze-Domains "glay.org", "amuro.net" etc. haben selbst leider noch keinen SPF-Record, aber man kann ihnen per Override ("v=spf1 include:mail.com -all") einen aufs Auge drücken. "mail.com" gehört auch Outblaze und ist mit SPF ausgestattet.
/.
DocSnyder.
--
Friss, Spammer, friss: http://docsnyder.de/spl/forum/
