PDA

Archiv verlassen und diese Seite im Standarddesign anzeigen : IMPORTANT NOTIFICATION



schara56
07.11.2004, 19:52
From antifraud_dep.ref.num6959997 [at] citibank.com Mon Nov 08 xx:xx:xx 2004
Return-Path: <antifraud_dep.ref.num6959997 [at] citibank.com>
X-Flags: 1001
Delivered-To: GMX delivery to poor [at] spamvictim.tld
Received: (qmail 25795 invoked by UID: [UID filtered]
Received: from wyng-02-066.dsl.netins.net (HELO D7V7Z311) (66.43.196.195)
by mx0.gmx.net (mx009) with SMTP; 08 Nov 2004 xx:xx:xx +0100
Message-ID: [ID filtered]
Received: from 220.36.11.247 by jwbu302-i1.arf89.hotmail.com with DAV;
Tue, 09 Nov 2004 xx:xx:xx +0600
Reply-To: "CitiBank" <antifraud_dep.ref.num6959997 [at] citibank.com>
From: "CitiBank" <antifraud_dep.ref.num6959997 [at] citibank.com>
To: <xxxx>
Subject: IMPORTANT NOTIFICATION
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 xx:xx:xx -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--LCA0TMa4WtYWG5qrsuGn9tAc"
X-GMX-Antivirus: 0 (no virus found)
X-GMX-Antispam: 5 (Score=5.967; FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS MIME_HTML_MOSTLY MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET MIME_HTML_ONLY SUBJ_ALL_CAPS MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI)
Angezeigter Link:
https://web.da-us.citibank.com/login.ref...client_conf.jsp (https://web.da-us.citibank.com/login.ref.9303/scripts/client_conf.jsp) I`m trying
Spamvertised Site:
http://213.2.96.94:38/cit/index.htm -> 213.2.0.0 - 213.2.255.255 -> VIA NET.WORKS UK and Ireland NOC
Technicalhservices of the BankSare carrying out a3planned software upgrade.
We earnestlygask you9to visit the followingDlink to start the procedureaof confirmation ofzcustomers`ddata. Santa Claus when he
https://web.da-us.citibank.com/login.ref...client_conf.jsp (https://web.da-us.citibank.com/login.ref.9303/scripts/client_conf.jsp) I`m trying
ThisQinstruction has been2sent to allYbank customersMand is obIigatory to foIow. do you think smart
We2present ourRapoIogies and thankUyou forico-operating.VIEW RESULTS
DavID: [ID filtered]
?????? exercising enoughhere you are
Andrea Thompson NY Yankees AYmember3oficitigroup
We might... Cindy Margolis CopyrightI&copy;E2004pCiticorpz
Teile des Textes waren natürlich mit weiss auf weissem Hintergrund geschrieben.
Abuse ist raus an:
emailspoof[at]citigroup.com
abuse[at]netins.net
Wieviel Sinn macht das den Bereich Phishing nochmal nach Banken/Phishing-Unternehmen (quasi bephishte Unternehmen) zu unterteilen oder einen "dicken" Threat für die jeweilige Bank zu machen?